| Tele-dad Sept | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
infernal_archmage
Posts : 172 Join date : 2011-04-01 Age : 33 Location : Cagayan de Oro, Philippines
| Subject: Tele-dad Sept Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:19 pm | |
| So with the new banlist officially up, I also decided to try out Tele-dad variants, the structure here is similar with other related decks but I'm still not happy with my build. Comments anyone? - Spoiler:
Last edited by infernal_archmage on Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:14 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
Harper7000 Chaosking
Posts : 2580 Join date : 2010-05-27
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:47 pm | |
| I'm trying Tele-dad this format too ofc, so I'll let you know real fixes when I test it. Offhand...not bad. No useless cards here. I would say use 3 E-Tele though, and I always prefer 2 Dudes whenever I use this draw engine. 2 Mali 2 Dude. But Doom Lord is a decent tech these days bc of xyz, so maybe both since 3 D-Draw. But probably just 4. Why Mental Seeker? just use Commander, less of a dead draw. Can't say much more until I test it but I'll let ya know. | |
|
| |
infernal_archmage
Posts : 172 Join date : 2011-04-01 Age : 33 Location : Cagayan de Oro, Philippines
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:04 am | |
| mental seeker is there because my psychic commander died together with 90% of my cards during the last great flood in our city. oh well, should I main doom or should I run him on the side? He's a great tech since he beats the crap out of Xyzs together with their materials. btw, if I put in a 3rd e-tele, what should I take out for it? | |
|
| |
Fallen King
Posts : 18 Join date : 2012-07-11
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:42 am | |
| Maybe -2 Compulse +2 Bottomless because of that grapha and shining which are gonna be all over the format.Also u should find place for return from a different dimension to add that otk element in the deck. | |
|
| |
infernal_archmage
Posts : 172 Join date : 2011-04-01 Age : 33 Location : Cagayan de Oro, Philippines
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:51 am | |
| I'm alternating between my traps as of now, finding which one would be best for this format. What should I take out for RFDD? | |
|
| |
Snilly
Posts : 248 Join date : 2012-01-12
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:02 am | |
| Cydras aren't needed or that great in this deck. Maybe add a grepher or necrogardna(s)? PWWB or Raigeki break could also be decent traps. 3 E-Tele is a must and you can take out commander for a third krebons. | |
|
| |
infernal_archmage
Posts : 172 Join date : 2011-04-01 Age : 33 Location : Cagayan de Oro, Philippines
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:23 am | |
| Cydras are actually great since they add more options to my syncs aside from just depending on malicious and its a LIGHT beater, I'm testing on running just 1. I tried PWWB and Raigeki Break but can't really manage those unless I run necro gardnas or something like those since 3 destiny draws is kind of enough for getting rid of malicious in my hand. And I put a lvl 3 psychic tuner for more flexibility, also since Koaki meiru drago kills me. | |
|
| |
Fallen King
Posts : 18 Join date : 2012-07-11
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:05 am | |
| For the RFDD drop one mst or side it just in case.I don't think that people will actually run many traps with so much backrow hate(mst night beam) Also drop the CS for caius.With caius u can own so many boss monsters + xyz + backrow | |
|
| |
infernal_archmage
Posts : 172 Join date : 2011-04-01 Age : 33 Location : Cagayan de Oro, Philippines
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:34 am | |
| all righty I'll try that, but I gotta buy me a Caius first, I traded the one I owned last year because I couldn't find a good use for it. xP | |
|
| |
Harper7000 Chaosking
Posts : 2580 Join date : 2010-05-27
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:48 am | |
| I see that's too bad :/. It's really up to you and how you want to play it of you want to do 1 Doom 1 Dude, 2 Dudes, or even 2 Dudes 1 Doom if you find room. He really is kinda a cool tech, but I have personally had good experiences with double dude in decks like these. In my prototype of this, its -2 Cydra, -1 Doom, -1 CS, -1 Seeker, -2 CED, +2 duality, +1 dude, +1 commander, +1 Grepher, +2 Mirror. Again, this is a prototype so it's not to say this is the best way since I still need to test it, particularly the trap lineup, but I believe this might give it a better late game if I can play the advantage game with Dude and normal spells. Also, if you mill Duality with him, you can special summon and play another Duality that turn, and it's a + | |
|
| |
infernal_archmage
Posts : 172 Join date : 2011-04-01 Age : 33 Location : Cagayan de Oro, Philippines
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:11 am | |
| yeah i know that, I'm still on the process of finalizing my trap list, and right now I'm placing PoDs every now and then. Dragons are abundant here so most of the time I get to use doom to get rid of that annoying Koa'ki meiru drago , I'm also thinking about the Cydra and Grepher, I mean, he does give a + but IDK, I run my grephers in my arrive dark so I'm kinda lazy of moving them around. | |
|
| |
infernal_archmage
Posts : 172 Join date : 2011-04-01 Age : 33 Location : Cagayan de Oro, Philippines
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:14 pm | |
| BUMP! Updated my deck list, please check it out! | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Tele-dad Sept | |
| |
|
| |
| Tele-dad Sept | |
|